but do patrons on net lose? ie, could the loss for patrons supporting multiple creators be offset by a gain for patrons supporting a single creator?
Yes. This is another possible problem: Supporters not reading their mail could be unhappy about being charged more all of a sudden. But itās their fault for not reading their email
And itās OK (in my eyes) because 1. I can reduce my pledge 2. I want to support the creator, so a little bit more shouldnāt be bad.
But I do not support paying multiple transaction fees to someone like PayPal just for fun.
Well, those are different people. If you only want to support some specific guy those new fees doesnāt change much and Patreon may be OK for you.
I certainly wonāt give them their 5% cut anymore so they can punish me for supporting multiple creators.
ā¦assuming that A) all those multiple $0.35 go to the payment provider and B) that the payment provider will get more money.
There are multiple transactions. They need to be paid. Typical PayPal fees in US are 2.9% + $0.30. Someone has to pay them no matter what (note that Patreon could have a bulk rate! still there are other fees like currency conversion which need to be compensated using those fees).
Percentage fees like 2.9% also arenāt the problem, they are the same as before and donāt depend on the number of transactions.
Thatās the point. $0.35 is what supporters pay to Patreon, not necessarily what Patreon pays to PayPal.
There is no way for us to know how much money PayPal will get, so we canāt conclude that PayPal will benefit from the new system.
No itās not. I donāt care if Patreon or PayPal makes more profit from it.
It doesnāt benefit me, it doesnāt benefit the creator, I donāt see a reason to pay it so I wonāt.
OK.
Well I do conclude this exact thing. A lot more transaction means more money to them. If they have agreed on a bulk rate which gets them less money with all those transactions then PayPal is really bad at negotiations and maybe should leave their money business behind them.
Feedback form regarding Patreon fees: https://jamiec1.typeform.com/to/gvucuX (or find the same link on their blog)
Iām glad that they decided to fix the issues interacting more with the community in the future.
There will be changes anyway but at least it seems that they will ask the opinion of creators and supporters before deploying big changes.
Oh man⦠that url to the feedback form instills nothing but confidence. Why isnāt it a Patreon url? These are the kind of links weāre told never to click on.
Click with confidence. Itās just a porn website.
I posted an alternate solution
Iām just not sure how to fix most of the problems they wanted address in the first place without having multiple transactions.
But as long it stays like it was (and still is) Iām happy.
This does a good job of going into why they did the changesā¦
From the article:
Pledges are promises, when they should be preorders. With a preorder, you donāt still get the product if you cancel the payment. You say āIāll payā, but if you donāt pay, you donāt play. That is perhaps the most absolute basic aspect of a transaction.
I disagree with this. Patreon is not a shop. For example I donāt ask anything in exchange for my pledge, because I want to donate money, not buying stuff.
It describes the fee issues well but it only talks about the patron side, mostly about the charge-up/double-charge problem.
But Patreon did try to make it better for creators with 1. having predictable pledges (-5%, thatās it) and 2. they get money immediately when they release a post (in case of per-post pledges).
Those reward tiers are promises (which he is talking about). Now I wonder: can you donate without actually selecting a tier (like on Kickstarter) or is the tier always automatic?
It works like Kickstarter, even if the interface to get the same result is different. You can give any arbitrary amount of money and you can choose between getting any of the rewards that that sum of money gives access to or getting no reward at all.