But taking a closer look there are three votes spread across all three questions. However there now is an inexplicable 34 % on ânoâ instead of 33 which doesn´t make any sense(except to reach perfectly hundred which also shouldn´t be possible, all questions should have 33,3333333âŚ).
InterestingâŚso in which banana republic did you take your democracy course, discourse? The united states?
Shhht. I spent 8 hours on Friday trying to get our software to equally split four 10-euro items between three people. The best solution we found was to have one of the people pay 4 cents more than the others.
They are not dead unless you kill every single one person who plays them and delete every single game from every computer on the planet. Do you need something to be mainstream for it to be considered alive? Great thing about the internet is that every niche stuff can still find an audience and be kept alive. So itâs not dead as long as there are a few people playing them.
I just meant that itâs not that black and white to me. I donât think adventure games in their broadest sense are dead, but old-style point-and-click ones perhaps are.
Iâm naturally quite a woolly person and tend to endlessly mull over things instead of having a yes/no opinion. Itâs probably why Iâm so indecisive (and why I did much better at uni than A Levels!)
Ah yes, it is. I probably couldnât decide whether to include it on here.
I meant any point-and-click, as opposed to games like Firewatch or The Witness (this is probably going to re-open that debate about what an adventure game is, but thatâs kind of my point!)
But arenât there far more (new) PnC games than âwalking simulatorsâ? For example the Daedalic games. Or the many indie games like âThe Darkside Detectiveâ âŚ